3
Total Submissions
+12%
Improvement Overall
74%
Best Score Achieved
Citations
Most Improved Criterion ↑
Grade Prediction
Latest Assessment
Overall Score
Last Submission
68%
↑ +6% from previous essay
AI Detection
Authenticity Check
● Low Risk
✓ Safe to submit — within acceptable threshold
Criterion Breakdown
Latest Submission · Trend vs Previous
Argument Structure
78%
↑
Academic Tone
71%
↑
Citations & Sources
82%
↑
Clarity & Coherence
60%
→
Introduction
54%
↓
Conclusion
63%
↑
Critical Analysis & Judgement
65%
→
Priority Actions
Fix These First
01
Strengthen your introduction
No clear thesis statement detected. Open with your argument, not background context.
02
Improve paragraph coherence
3 paragraphs lack clear topic sentences. Each para should begin with a claim.
03
Deepen critical analysis
More counterargument engagement needed. Currently too descriptive in sections 3–4.
04
Maintain citation quality
Citations strong — keep OSCOLA format consistent in all footnotes.
Performance Over Time
All Submissions — Overall Score
+12%
Total improvement
3
Essays submitted
2:2→2:1
Grade progression
Overall Score
Citations
Clarity
Expert Review — In Progress
A subject-specialist is reviewing your Law essay submitted 7 Mar. Written feedback delivered within 48 hrs.
Dr. M. Osei · Law & Jurisprudence · Est. delivery 9 Mar 2026
Submission History
All 3 essays
| Date | Essay | Score | Grade | AI Risk | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 Mar 2026 |
The Rule of Law and Constitutional Reform
|
68% | 2:1 | LOW | |
| 18 Feb 2026 |
Judicial Independence in the UK
|
62% | 2:2 | MED | |
| 4 Jan 2026 |
Human Rights Act: Case for Reform
|
56% | 2:2 | LOW |